World War Two caused America to reluctantly abandon the policy of Isolationism Essay Example

World War Two made America hesitantly relinquish the approach of Isolationism Paper I have blended emotions about whether World War Two spelt the finish of US Isolationism. I accept that somewhat this time was the least Isolationist the US had ever been, nonetheless, as I would see it American interests consistently engaged worldwide regardless of certain presidents neutralist international strategies. Churchill needed the United States associated with the war, straightforwardly looking for a battling occurrence that would carry the unbiased country into the contention. On August 4, 1941, Churchill and Roosevelt met just because, in the wake of comparing for a long time. The Atlantic Charter was one aftereffect of their gathering; another was the start of a profound individual kinship. They shared a few regular qualities: both originated from world class foundations, both were aristocrats, and both considered their to be as law based aristocrats. Churchill came back to England and told his War Cabinet that Roosevelt would take up arms however would not announce it. The episode Churchill required happened on September 4, 1941, when the USS Greer, on a mail rush to Iceland, was associated with a battling occurrence with a German U-vessel. In his ensuing location to the country, FDR would in general mutilate the established truths, utilizing the event to start unlimited convoying and a constrained, protective maritime war. At that point on October 31, 1941, a German U-vessel torpedoed a U.S. transport. This flagged what was to be the finish of American lack of bias. The shelling of Pearl Harbor in December, 1941, denoted the clear finish of American neutrality in useful terms. We will compose a custom paper test on World War Two made America hesitantly relinquish the strategy of Isolationism explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom article test on World War Two made America hesitantly desert the approach of Isolationism explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom exposition test on World War Two made America hesitantly desert the arrangement of Isolationism explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer During the war, the U.S. sent soldiers to Asia, Africa and Europe. After the wars end, the leftovers of the League of Nations re-framed as the United Nations, and this time the United States was up front. Under the Truman Doctrine, American monetary and military guide went to countries compromised by socialism. The Marshall Plan rebuilded Europe and the Cold War made an American military nearness abroad an inevitable end product for the following 50 years. Roosevelt didn't live long enough to see the war unfurl however subsequent to pronouncing war he out of nowhere kicked the bucket of a cerebrum discharge. Roosevelt was supplanted by Harry Truman. The US had stayed away from war in World War One due to numerous elements financial reasons and general conclusion being the most significant ones. Anyway by 1945 things had changed and Truman viewed the war as a splendid chance. Fuelled by German Hatred after the occasions of Pearl Harbor, Truman had the general population on his side. He had the support of Congress and his very own perspectives that the US required war as a monetary chance (selling weapons) and his motto to make the world safe for vote based system. (Safe from German Imperialism.) With these positive factors the US entered a war of chances. Abroad, World War II stopped American noninterference. In the spring of 1945, the US joined agents from 50 countries in marking the sanction for a lasting United Nations, a year prior to the International Monetary Fund and World Bank were built up to advance financial participation among countries. Be that as it may, the greatest test confronting the United States in the after war world was the souring of relations with the Soviet Union because of that countrys mastery of Eastern Europe and backing of socialist revolts far and wide. As a feature of the push to contain the Soviet spread and to restore the economies of Western Europe, the United States propelled the European Recovery Program (typically known as the Marshall Plan,) which emptied $13 billion of help into the area. Likewise, the US received a strategy of regulation, supporting non-socialist territories at risk for infringement. Consequently, when the Soviet Union barred every single surface course into Berlin, the US and Britain propelled the Berlin Airlift, providing the western segments of the city via air. We do need to address anyway whether the US was genuinely Isolationist. It would have been oblivious for any president to disregard world issues as though there was an open door for intercession then the US may have had the option to profit by a circumstance and increase additional grounds. All things considered, crude materials in the US couldn't keep going for ever. As I would see it Truman had no aim of staying Isolationist for the World War, regardless of his political decision promise of US Isolationism. All through the war he provided Britain with advances and battling gear also s expanding the US armed forces and Navies and supporting the Ententes bar of Germany. World War Two was a significant purpose of progress for the US. Starting now and into the foreseeable future they saw it their obligation to mediate in world issues (world police officer) since they were the universes most persuasive force, and after all could profit with the picking up of land and assets from specific nations. Take for instance the ongoing war in Iraq, a nation where the US is presently increasing significant measures of oil from. Despite the fact that the US job as a world cop is probably world based, as I would see it this isn't the situation. Take for instance occasions after world war two. There have been significant wars in Vietnam and in Iraq, however these were just achieved in view of dangers to the US nation. Without a doubt the US are hesitant to engage in any war which has no impact on them. Vietnam was achieved by American dread of Communism, and wars in Iraq in light of its important assets and the psychological oppression assaults of September the eleventh. During the Cold War, a few Americans contended that the nation ought to pull back from the United Nations; yet the Cold War, as an energetic and ideological campaign, shielded those voices from accepting across the board support. Today, the United States government and military is whatever word would best depict the extraordinary inverse of neutralist. As I would see it this is the manner by which they have in every case subtly been. US interests were consistently across the board; its simply that when World War Two showed up the US were monetarily and socially prepared to build up a world job. The breakout of war gave an ideal chance/pardon for the US to move away from its Isolationist picture. The Challenge to Isolationism. 1. What was FDRs prompt reaction to the episode of war in Europe? Roosevelt was reappointed by the US open on the guarantee that he would keep the US out of World War Two. Anyway he before long understood that war in Europe could prompt war in America thus upheld the associated arrangement of submission to guarantee harmony. Roosevelt needed to plan America for the most exceedingly awful however. He accepted the security of Europe was pivotal to the security of America. He had the option to convince Congress to affirm the Naval Expansion Act permitting a 20% increment in the US naval force. In 1939, he got an extra $525 million for air barrier. Toward the beginning of the Second World War, be that as it may, the American armed force still just numbered 185,000. 2. Did a dominant part of the US open and government officials favor noninterference in the early months of the war? 3. What enactment was remembered for the Neutrality Act of 4/11/39? During the 1930s, US popular supposition just as a few Senators scrutinized the legitimacy of US contribution in the Great War. The conviction turned out to be progressively regular that the country was deluded into participating in this ridiculous clash by Allied purposeful publicity and to serve the premiums of benefit parched investors and industrialists. The finishes of the Nye Committee in 1934, entrusted with researching the unreasonable benefits made by the war combat hardware industry, strengthened the antiwar position of the American individuals and settles the countrys noninterventionist strategy. As a response to Germanys re-weapon, and to forestall any US inclusion in a potential European war, the US Congress casted a ballot the Neutrality Act, marked by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 31, 1935. The Act restricts exchange military material with warring nations and travel by US nationals on ships having a place with warring nations. It was altered in 1936 to preclude credits to warring nations, and afterward in January and March 1937 to incorporate common wars. Toward the start of WWII, the likelihood that Great Britain could be vanquished is genuine and the developing Nazi danger is a reason for dread. Roosevelt understands that the Neutrality Act forces limitations on conceivable US activities; alterations will be embraced to reduce the enactments scope. Providing countries at war will be approved on the money and convey rule. President proclaims territory around British Isles a battle zone in November 1939, and credits of military material will be conceivable on a land-rent understanding. Outline of Neutrality Act of 1939; This demonstration annuls the arms ban and substitutes a strategy of money and convey; precludes United States vessels and residents from entering battle zones; builds up the National Munitions Control made out of the Secretaries of States, Treasury, War, Navy, and Commerce. 4. What effect did Hitlers fruitful Blitzkrieg have on American perspectives? The speed with which the German armed force overran Western Europe stunned the American open. By June 1940, the Nazis were in charge of Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium and France. Through the late spring and fall the Battle of Britain was battled with Britain and its domain remaining solitary against the Nazi danger. The communicates of writer Ed Murrow from London during the Blitz did a lot to convey to Americans the force of the battle taking spots, and this prompted cries from the US open for American mediation in the war.

Definition Essay Sample on Love What Is for Me

Definition Essay Sample on Love What Is for Me What is love? A large number of logicians invested a lot of energy in this subject, however none of them figured out how to give a worthy reaction. Words seemed, by all accounts, to be excessively crude to explane this one of a kind inclination. What I can say precisely is that each individual comprehends the importance of adoration in their individual way. Also, it is senseless to sum up any of these implications! For instance the manner in which I comprehend the job of adoration in my life is unique; be that as it may, anyone can say the equivalent. By the way I dont have faith in any tests in magazines on account of their dull speculation. Were all extraordinary, our emotions are unique, they cannot be placed in any limitations. I recollect that someone once said that individuals call LOVE two totally various emotions. Attacks a cushion, envy, clashes every one of that implies I need you have a place just with me. In any case, the correct importance of adoration is I need you to be upbeat! Furthermore, in the event that you think that way, there isâ really no distinction, regardless of whether you are along with your darling or not. It is difficult, gracious yes! In any case, such love is light.

Discuss Changing Family Structures in the Uk and Give Examples of Sociological Theories That Provide Explanations as to Why and How Families Have Changed.

Talk about changing family structures in the UK and give instances of sociological hypotheses that give clarifications with respect to why and how families have changed. This article will talk about the different family structures in the public arena. It will give hypothetical clarification with respect to why and how families have changed. The exposition will likewise bring factual, verifiable and political proof to back up the purpose behind these changes. During the pre-modern culture the ‘extended family’ was the most widely recognized family structure.This family structure includes three ages including the guardians, kids and either the grandparents (vertical-broadened) or uncles and aunties (on a level plane expanded). The more distant family structure was basic for this general public as families were a ‘unit of production’ so they required the same number of laborers as they could get. Michael Anderson (1971) contended that in ‘critical life si tuations’ there was a reliance on the more distant family for help and backing. At that point Parsons (1949) said huge families were monetarily helpful, so the more distant family was the most fit structure.However, during in the mechanical unrest family life changed. It was no longer observed as a ‘unit of production’ yet now a ‘unit of consumption’. The ‘nuclear family’ developed and turned into the fundamental family structure. Be that as it may, the more distant family may become well known again as in our present society individuals are living longer and state financing on private consideration has diminished so this has moved the consideration and duty onto the family. Likewise, there has been an expansion in Multi-generational families. ‘The prior period of youngster bearing lessening the age hole between generations’ (Fulcher and Scott, 2011: 446)The ‘nuclear family’ comprised of two ages, the mother, fa ther and their kids. Parsons (1949) contended that industrialisation brought about a move from the more distant family to the family unit, as its qualities are progressively run of the mill for an entrepreneur society. Parsons (1956) accepted that you should move where there is work and that you should just take your close family with you not every person. This is the reason family units were increasingly helpful as it was simpler to move for work with simply your prompt amily. With the mechanical upheaval and the development of free enterprise, creation was not, at this point did by relatives, however by laborers. Open strategies were set up during 1940-1970, for example, the government assistance state, which was intended to help family jobs (provider and caring mother). From that point forward there has been noteworthy changes in open arrangements, for example, the separation change act (1967), the premature birth act (1967), the equivalent compensation act (1970), the sex segreg ation act (1975) and maternity leave was introduced.This gave ladies more opportunity and more open doors particularly inside work and way of life decisions. This lead to social change; delay of marriage and childbearing, the quantity of separations in England and Wales expanded from 6,000 of every 1938 to more than 48,000 out of 1968, and in 1960 the ripeness rate was 2. 72%, dropping to 1. 93% in 1998. Because of these fast increments in separate from dwelling together has gotten increasingly ideal for couples as there are no legitimate ties, the couple can perceive how it goes before settling on any significant choices, for example, marriage.Also couples may wed later as weddings are costly and they don’t have the cash to bear the cost of one because of the downturn, anyway living with one another sets aside cash. This was the fair and instructive transformation and the time of the family unit. Nonetheless, with new strategies set up and such significant social change, fro m the 1970s onwards it turned into the ‘post-mechanical society’ and the ascent of post-innovation. This general public brought new family structures, and units that were recently seen as inadmissible became acceptable.Since the separation change act (1967) divorces have quickly expanded bringing about numerous re-relationships, presenting the reconstituted nuclear family. This family incorporates youngsters that live with one organic parent and a stage parent. These families may likewise incorporate advance/relatives and sisters. Separation has likewise implied there are a lot progressively single-parent families. This is a family structure where just one parent deals with the youngsters. This can be because of birth outside of marriage, separation and passing or detainment of a partner.Murray (1990) would contend that the ascent in single parent families is because of the underclass and bastard families. Young men without fathers are insufficiently mingled and donâ₠¬â„¢t have a male good example. At the point when they have their own youngsters they wont have a comprehension of a ‘dad’ job, so this may bring about them being missing in the child’s life and partition from the spouse/accomplice. Marx (1848) would contend that the breakdown of marriage is because of the contention that the industrialist society is making and this is influencing relationships.Feminist, Delphy (1977) contends that the abuse of women’s work is established in ‘the residential method of production’ inside the family unit, not in the entrepreneur method of creation. ‘Men hold an unrivaled situation inside the household method of creation and adventure ladies through marriage’ (Fulcher and Scott, 2011: 435). This misuse could make struggle and abusive behavior at home may happen bringing about partition/separate. Ultimately, a few people accuse single-parent families for the tolerance of the sexual revolution.Jeffrey Weeks (1989) accepts that post-war changes in private enterprise has prompted another delight looking for demeanor in females, which brought about sexual conduct as a wellspring of joy rather a methods for delivering youngsters. This can identify with why there are such huge numbers of single-parent families headed by ladies from births outside marriage. At last the latest sort of family structure is ‘same sex families’. This includes a gay couple (gay or lesbian) that deal with youngsters. This is the freshest nuclear family as the common association law was just passed in 2004.Since then 45,000 have been shaped up until 2010. Gay couples have been evident for quite a while anyway as of late have the perspectives towards them become increasingly worthy bringing about the common association law. Beck (1992) says this is a result of individualisation; individuals are structuring their lives dependent on their own decision not desires. Additionally, individuals have altog ether different mentalities currently to beforehand ever, so homosexuality is all the more generally acknowledged. All in all, family structures are continually changing and there will never be just one type.Family structures will in general base around fitting the kind of society there in. Approaches can increment or lessening certain family structures. For instance the separation change act (1967) expanded single parent and reconstituted families and diminished the family unit. Additionally new family structures, same sex families have been presented in view of approaches and change in mentalities. There might be new family structures later on as society advances. References-Fulcher, J. what's more, Scott, J. (2011) Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Core Mountain Man Brewing Company Bringing the Brand Free Essays

Center Marketing Mountain Man Brewing Company Bringing the Brand to Light 1. Review Mountain Man Brewing Company (MMBC, or the Client) is a family-run business in West Virginia that has encountered a lot of development since propelling its lead premium lager Mountain Man Lager (MMB) in 1925. Throughout the decades, brand dependability, quality and brand mindfulness have been the foundations of the Client’s achievement †the significance of the MMBC brand among purchasers has permitted the organization to fabricate its little however steady piece of the overall industry in the East Central district (ECR), especially in its home express, the main locale it disseminates in (7. We will compose a custom paper test on Center Mountain Man Brewing Company Bringing the Brand or on the other hand any comparable point just for you Request Now % of the market with in excess of 50 million USD in income). 2. Difficulties Opportunities * Challenges MMBC right now faces a possibly personality evolving challenge: The customary premium lager advertise has been declining at a compound yearly pace of 4%, and MMB encountered a 2% decline in income a year ago, the first drop in quite a while whole history; appropriately, MMBC’s target point is to recuperate from the 2% decline in income that happened in the earlier year. * Opportunities The light brew advertise †famous with more youthful consumers †has additionally been developing at a CAGR of 4%. In spite of the fact that MMBC has been verifiably feeble in the 35-years-and-under portion, there is chance to create more deals by discharging another Mountain Man Light Beer (MML) line to focus on this more youthful market. Nonetheless, there is the danger of contrarily affecting their present dispersion of MMB through rack space cannibalization and greater expenses; just as the danger of distancing their center portion of more seasoned, hands on consumers. . Investigation MMBC faces conceivably losing more income at the current anticipated compound yearly abatement pace of 2% †the anticipated reduction for MMB independent in year-to-year net income from real 520,000 barrels sold in 2005 (USD 50. 4 m) to 470,039 barrels (around USD 45. 6 m) by 2010 aggregates about 10% (see Exhibit 1). As per the key age socioeconomics among brew consumers, MMB’s c lient division is as of now as follows: 64% for a long time and up, and just 17% for a long time and under. However the ECR breakdown for utilization by lager type is the inverse: 50. 4% for light and just 19. 7% for premium. Because of the staggering potential in the light lager advertise, we have arranged projections on development in incomes and costs for MMBC should they choose to push ahead with preparing Mountain Man Light (see Exhibit 2A, 2B). * Making Mountain Man Lighter (and More Profitable) Considerations have been made seeing MMB staying as an independent item (once more, see Exhibit 1). Notwithstanding, per the Client’s directions, this report will concentrate on anticipated execution looking at MMBC’s passage into the light brew advertise at their normal MMB decrease pace of 20%. As indicated by our investigation, MML would even now bring about a huge increment in income inside two years: With the new item blend, net gain edge increments from an immaterial 0. 88% in MML’s first year to a powerful 3. 7% by its subsequent year (2007), even with contemplations on the extra costs that would go into propelling another item †fabricating, promoting, general working (see Exhibit 2A). Also, the anticipated MMB+MML deals volume after just two years would almost coordinate MMBC’s current volume level †500,895 barrels to 520,000 †and would in the long run surpass the 2005 figure in 2008; while independent figures show a ceaseless lessening from the 2005 benchmark and in the long run fall behind MML deals by 2011 (Exhibit 3). * Issues to Consider The figure for MMB +MML deals are promising. Nonetheless, JAFREM must note huge issues to consider with the introduced information: 1) Due to constrained deals volume for the initial six years, sway on COGS has not been contemplated; should the present creation limit levels be surpassed, extra sources of info in regards to CAPEX (for instance, for new plants) will be essential. 2) With the determined MML development rate, the Client’s piece of the overall industry in the ERC adds up to 1. 5% following five years; MMB has not accomplished this level after over 50 years in the business thus contemplations on the MMB decrease rate have additionally been given (Exhibit 2B). 4. Suggestions Light lager is an alluring recommendation for MMBC, particularly with the abatement in the exceptional brew section. As needs be, overlooking the dynamic development in the light fragment is basically a lot of a chance to let pass. So as to diminish the dangers that accompany propelling MML (estranging center clients, advancing a bombed item), we suggests the accompanying measures: * To abstain from losing brand value at the shopper level for MMB, pilot the MML dispatch outside West Virginia, as this is MMBC’s most grounded and most faithful market; should the testing demonstrate fruitful, at that point thought can be made on moving into West Virginia. Should the MML development estimate not be acknowledged following two years, return center to MMB dissemination at a national level; while promoting and deals at the grass roots level has been useful for MMBC, there has been no endeavor to arrive at a bigger showcasing through the customary station of TV media. * Despite the nor mal diminishing in the excellent brew showcase, MMB still can possibly catch more piece of the overall industry by growing its promoting exercises and buyer base outside the ERC. Display 1 †Lager Standalone Projections MMB Standalone (next five years)â | | 2005| 2006| 2007| 2008| 2009| 2010| Barrels| 520,000| 509,600| 499,408| 489,420| 479,631| 470,039| Price per Barrel| $97. 00| $97. 00| $97. 00| $97. 00| $97. 00| $97. 00| Net Revenue| 50,440,000| 49,431,200| 48,442,576| 47,473,724| 46,524,250| 45,593,765| COGS| 34,803,600| 34,107,528| 33,425,377| 32,756,870| 32,101,732| 31,459,698| Gross Margin| 15,636,400| 15,323,672| 15,017,199| 14,716,855| 14,422,517| 14,134,067| SGA| 9,583,600| Other Op. Exp. 1,412,320| Operating Margin| 4,640,480| 4,327,752| 4,021,279| 3,720,935| 3,426,597| 3,138,147| Other Income| 151,320| Net Income before Tax| 4,791,800| 4,479,072| 4,172,599| 3,872,255| 3,577,917| 3,289,467| Prov. Salary Tax| 1,677,130| 1,567,675| 1,460,409| 1,355,289| 1,252,271| 1,1 51,314| Net Income After Tax| 3,114,670| 2,911,397| 2,712,189| 2,516,965| 2,325,646| 2,138,154| Net Present Value| 3,114,670| 2,599,461| 2,162,141| 1,791,526| 1,477,990| 1,213,246| Display 2A †MMB + MML Projections | 2005| 2006| 2007| 2008| 2009| 2010| 2011| MML Barrels| 0| 48â 735| 101â 369| 158â 136| 219â 282| 285â 066| 355â 763| MMB Barrels| 520â 000| 407â 680| 399â 526| 391â 536| 383â 705| 376â 031| 368â 510| Growth%|  | - 12%| 10%| Price per Barrel| $97| Net Revenue| 50â 440â 000| 44â 272â 273| 48â 586â 872| 53â 318â 166| 58â 489â 738| 64â 126â 451| 70â 254â 508| COGS| 34â 803â 600| 30â 776â 437| 34â 000â 363| 37â 531â 192| 41â 386â 351| 45â 584â 213| 50â 144â 138| COGS/Revenue| 69. 00%| 69. 52%| 69. 98%| 70. 39%| 70. 6%| 71. 08%| 71. 37%| Gross Margin| 15â 636â 400| 13â 495â 837| 14â 586â 509| 15â 786â 974| 17â 103â 387| 18â 542â 239| 20â 110â 370| SGA| 9â 583â 600| 11â 233â 600| 10â 483â 600| Other Op. Expenses2| 1â 412â 320| MML, Extra Ad Expenses| 0| 400â 000| Op. Expenses| 10â 995â 920| 13â 045â 920| 12â 295â 920| %|  | 18. 64%| - 5. 75%| 0. 00%| 0. 00%| 0. 00%| 0. 00%| Op. Profit| 4â 640â 480| 449â 917| 2â 290â 589| 3â 491â 054| 4â 807â 467| 6â 246â 319| 7â 814â 450| Op. Margin|  | - 90. 30%| 409. 11%| 52. 41%| 37. 71%| 29. 93%| 25. 10%| Other Income| 151â 320| Net Income before Tax| 4â 791â 800| 601â 237| 2â 441â 909| 3â 642â 374| 4â 958â 787| 6â 397â 639| 7â 965â 770| Prov. Salary Tax| 1â 677â 130| 210â 433| 854â 668| 1â 274â 831| 1â 735â 575| 2â 239â 173| 2â 788â 019| Net Income After Tax| 3â 114â 670| 390â 804| 1â 587â 241| 2â 367â 543| 3â 223â 212| 4â 158â 465| 5â 177â 750| Net Income Margin| 6. 18%| 0. 88%| 3. 27%| 4. 44%| 5. 51%| 6. 48%| 7. 7%| NPV| 3â 114â 670| 348â 932| 1â 265â 339| 1â 685â 170| 2â 048â 409| 2â 359â 625| 2â 623â 209| Exhibit 2B †Inputs Stress Test Results Inputs| | Stress scenario| MMB, Avg. Piece of the overall industry Growth| 0. 25%| | Year| MML, Avg. Piece of the overall industry Growth| Reduction Rate| MMB, Var. Cost per Barrel| 66. 93| | 2006| 0. 04% | 30. 19%| MML, Var. Cost per Barrel| 4. 69| | 2010| 0. 28%| 17. 28%| Reduction Rate| 20%| | 2011| 0. 23%| 21. 80%| Discount Rate| 12%| | MMB, Growth Rate| - 2%| | Price per Barrel | $97| | MMB, Extra Ad Expenses| $0| | MML Growth Rate| 2%| | MML, SGA in 2006| $900,000| | MML, SGA Extra Launch| $750,000| | Exhibit 3 †MMB (remain solitary) versus MMB + MML â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€ [ 1 ]. Figure arranged by the 2% compound yearly diminishing rate gave by the Client [ 2 ]. SGA and Other Operating Expenses are amount inde

North Little Rock

North Little Rock North Little Rock, city (1990 pop. 61,741), Pulaski co., central Ark., on the Arkansas River opposite Little Rock; settled c.1856, inc. as a city 1903. North Little Rock lies in a cotton, rice, soybean, dairy-cattle, and truck-farm area. There is food processing and printing and the manufacture of consumer goods, fiberglass and electronic products, building materials, hospital garments, bakery products, feed, furniture, fertilizers, and chemicals. In the early 19th cent. the discovery of a small silver vein drew settlers to the area, which was then called Silver City. Most of the area later became part of Little Rock, but in 1903 local citizens pushed a bill through the Arkansas legislature permitting a part of Little Rock to secede and join the small village of North Little Rock. Nearby is Camp Joseph T. Robinson, the headquarters of the Arkansas National Guard. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. See m ore Encyclopedia articles on: U.S. Political Geography